Психофармакологические тесты в диагностике аффективных расстройств

Таким образом, для выбора адекватной терапии приступов аффективных психозов необходимо понять структуру состояния больного, отражающую механизмы образования его синдрома. Для этой цели клинический метод успешно дополняется психофармакологическими тестами. Лечение аффективных и аффектив­но-бредовых больных (кроме маниакальных) целесообразно начи­нать с пробного терапевтического курса анксиолитиками (феназепамом, лепонексом) или с диазепамового теста. В зависимости от трансформации клинической картины, указывающей на основ­ное биологическое расстройство, на «блок», являющийся основой патологического состояния, в дальнейшем назначаются антиде­прессивные или энергизирующие препараты. Создается впечатление,  что сфера применения нейролептиков в терапии аффективных приступов должна быть весьма ограниченной рамками маниакаль­ных и маниакально-параноидных состояний, в комбинации с нормотимиками.

 Точилов В.А. - ОБ ИССЛЕДОВАНИИ СТРУКТУРЫ И ЛЕЧЕНИИ АФФЕКТИВНЫХ ПРИСТУПОВ

Стратегии потенцирования действия клозапина

Background. When schizophrenia patients have insufficient response to clozapine, pharmacological augmentation is often applied. This meta-analysis summarizes available evidence on efficacy of pharmacological augmentation of clozapine treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorder.

Methods. Only double-blind randomized controlled studies were included. Primary outcome measure was total symptom severity, and secondary outcome measures were subscores for positive and negative symptoms. Effect sizes were calculated from individual studies and combined to standardized mean differences (Hedges's g). Results. Twenty-nine studies reporting on 15 different augmentations were included. Significant better efficacy than placebo on total symptom severity was observed for lamotrigine, citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 (a glutamatergic agonist). The positive effect of lamotrigine disappeared after outlier removal. The other positive findings were based on single studies. Significantly better efficacy on positive symptom severity was observed for topiramate and sulpiride. The effect of topiramate disappeared after outlier removal.

Results for sulpiride were based on a single randomized controlled trial. Citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 showed better efficacy for negative symptoms than placebo, all based on single studies.

Conclusions. Evidence for efficacy of clozapine augmentation is currently scarce. Efficacy of lamotrigine and topiramate were both dependent on single studies with deviating findings. The effect of citalopram, sulpiride, and CX516 were based on single studies. Thus, despite their popularity, pharmacological augmentations of clozapine are not (yet) demonstrated to be superior to placebo.

 Pharmacological Augmentation Strategies for Schizophrenia Patients With Insufficient Response to Clozapine: A Quantitative Literature Review

Антипсихотики второго поколения в терапии депрессии

Abstract

Purpose of review The aim of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD).
Recent findings In MDD, SGA monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to conventional antidepressants showed rapid onset of antidepressant efficacy. Although maintenance data are limited, quetiapine monotherapy, risperidone adjunctive therapy, and amisulpride adjunctive therapy significantly delayed the time to relapse as compared with placebo. In general, extrapyramidal symptoms appeared to be low with SGAs, but a higher incidence of akathisia was observed with aripiprazole. An elevated risk of weight gain was observed with olanzapine–fluoxetine combination, risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine compared with placebo. At present, there are insufficient data to confidently distinguish between different SGAs in the treatment of MDD. A recent meta-analysis found that adjunctive SGAs were significantly more effective than placebo, but differences in efficacy were not identified among the studied agents, nor were outcomes affected by trial duration or the method of establishing treatment resistance.
Summary Both SGA monotherapy and adjunctive therapy showed greater efficacy in the treatment of MDD than placebo, but augmentation is more widely utilized in treatment-resistant depression. Clinicians should routinely monitor for cardiometabolic side-effects and extrapyramidal symptoms during SGA therapy.

Quetiapine

The efficacy and safety of QTP-XR monotherapy in the treatment of MDD were evaluated in two 8-week, placebo-controlled RCTs.[7••,8•] In the first trial, QTP-XR 150 or 300 mg/day and duloxetine 60 mg/day were compared with placebo.[7••] All active treatment arms demonstrated significant improvement in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)[27] total scores compared with that of placebo at week 6. Significant improvement in depressive symptoms occurred at the end of week 1 with both QTP-XR 150 mg/day (−8.4, P < 0.01) and 300 mg/day (−8.2, P < 0.01) compared with placebo (−6.0), but not duloxetine 60 mg/day (−6.8, P = 0.30). At study endpoint (week 6), remission rates (MADRS ≤ 8) were significantly higher in the QTP-XR 300 mg/day (32.0%, P < 0.05) and duloxetine 60 mg/day groups (31.9%, P < 0.05) vs. placebo (20.4%), but not for QTP-XR 150 mg/day (26.5%, P = 0.27).
Sulpiride and Amisulpride

Apart from QTP-XR, SLP and ASLP are the only other SGAs that have been studied as monotherapy treatment for MDD in placebo-controlled trials. A moderately sized (n = 88) study found greater reduction in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-21)[28] total score from baseline to endpoint in the SLP group (−10, P = 0.0007) than in placebo (−8). The only RCT of ASLP in the acute treatment of MDD compared a fixed dosage of ASLP 50 mg/day (n = 136) with paroxetine 20 mg/day (n = 136).[11] No statistically significant differences occurred between the two treatments, but a placebo group was not included to establish internal validity.[11] A long-term (6-month), fixed-dosage, placebo-controlled RCT in mild or moderate MDD or dysthymia compared the efficacy and safety of ASLP (50 mg/day) with imipramine (100 mg/day) and placebo.[12] Analysis of the primary outcome showed the mean change in MADRS total scores in both active treatment arms was significantly larger than that of placebo, although remission rates did not reach the level of statistical significance.

Second-generation Antipsychotics in Major Depressive Disorder: Update and Clinical Perspective

Потенциирование клозапина: сульпирид, амисульприд, ламотриджин

A frequent treatment strategy for clozapine-resistant patients with schizophrenia is the use of specific augmentors that are suitable for adjunctive therapy. Clozapine is a polyvalent drug but it lacks high-potency dopamine receptor blockade (Kerwin & Osborne, 2000). Therefore, there has been interest in using as augmentors substituted benzamides with highly selective dopamine receptor blocking profiles (Kerwin, 2000). Augmentation strategies incorporating sulpiride are well documented. The authors of one study of sulpiride augmentation in 28 patients partially responsive to clozapine (Shiloh et al, 1997) noted a mean reduction of about 40–50% in various clinical response scores (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms).

Several groups have been interested in mimicking this study with amisulpride, a relative of sulpiride that is even more selective at the dopamine D2 receptor. A case series by Zink et al(2004) showed improvement in previously treatment-resistant symptoms following a combined treatment strategy of clozapine and amisulpride. In addition, our group performed an open trial of amisulpride augmentation in a long-term (52 weeks) study. Significant improvement was observed in half of the patients, with no additional side-effects. Moreover, this study monitored plasma levels to determine whether this was a pharmacokinetic interaction. Clozapine levels did not change throughout the duration of the trial, suggesting a pharmacodynamic interaction (Munro et al, 2004).

Augmentation with anti-epileptics
A glutamate hyperfunction hypothesis of schizophrenia has generated interest in the role of glutamate release inhibitors as clozapine augmentors. In a study of 26 treatment-resistant patients receiving lamotrigine (17) or topirimate (9) in addition to their existing antipsychotic treatment (a variety of antipsychotics), a significant improvement was observed when lamotrigine was added to risperidone, haloperidol, olanzapine or flupenthixol. However, no significant effect was observed in patients receiving topirimate augmentation in addition to clozapine, olanzapine, haloperidol or flupenthixol (Dursun & Deakin, 2001). The therapeutic effects of lamotrigine augmentation were also assessed in a rigorous randomised placebo-controlled cross-over study of 34 clozapine-resistant patients (Tiihonen et al, 2003). In this 14-week study, lamotrigine treatment significantly improved positive symptoms and general psychopathological symptoms, but had no effect on negative symptoms. The authors suggested that this was the first time a non-dopamine antagonist had proven efficacy in schizophrenia, giving further credence to the hyperglutamate neurotransmission hypothesis for the generation of positive symptoms in the disorder.

Management of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia