Эффективность использования высоких доз антидепрессантов

Higher doses than those currently used might be modestly more effective, but come with higher risks of adverse effects.

Before writing medications off as ineffective or only partially effective, clinicians strive to optimize dosing. To better identify optimal doses for six selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), investigators applied meta-analytic techniques to 40 studies involving 10,039 patients with major depression in placebo-controlled randomized trials who were treated with fluoxetine, (N=2386), fluvoxamine (N=910), paroxetine (N=3424), sertraline (N=865), citalopram (N=1349), or escitalopram (N=1105).

Focusing on efficacy and tolerability, investigators calculated number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). They used published dose ranges to convert SSRI doses to imipramine equivalents, with 100 mg of imipramine equivalent to:

Sertraline, 120 mg

Fluvoxamine, 100 mg

Paroxetine, 20 mg

Fluoxetine, 20 mg

Citalopram, 33.3 mg

Escitalopram, 16.7 mg

Statistical modelling adjusted for lag times of medication-effect onsets and for doses used in the trials (100–400 mg of imipramine equivalents). In dose-by-time interaction analyses, higher doses yielded greater therapeutic responses. Greatest efficacy was seen for 200–250-mg imipramine equivalents, compared with higher and lower ranges (NNTs: compared with placebo, 3; in lower-dose comparisons, 14–16). Compared with low doses, higher dose was associated with greater likelihood of dropout due to adverse effects (NNHs, 45–48), but all-cause dropouts were fewer at higher doses, presumably due to efficacy. Fluvoxamine, approved for depression in other countries but not by the FDA, was excluded in some analyses, which yielded similar overall results.

Comment

These findings generally support the use of higher dose ranges for several SSRIs for major depression that did not respond or only partially responded to SSRIs. Most clinicians treating obsessive-compulsive disorder and bulimia nervosa are already comfortably using these higher doses. However, distinctions among SSRIs are warranted; for example, the FDA has issued warnings about QTc interval prolongation with higher doses of citalopram.

 Optimal Doses for SSRIs in Treating Depression: Meta-Analytic Results

Добавление креатина к СИОЗС

"There are some animal studies that show that this augmentation may be helpful, and there are older studies looking at enzymes in humans related to creatine that seem to be altered during episodes of depression, so there has been a sense that something may be going on here," he said.

"Creatine is a relatively harmless addition, so it's very testable, and would be very usable, and the fact that the American Journal of Psychiatry accepted the article signals genuine interest. It would be great to have a tool like this," he said.

 Dietary Supplement Speeds Clinical Efficacy of SSRIs

Влияние различных антидепрессантов на фазы сна

A clinical consequence of REM suppression can be a change in frequency and intensity of dreaming, as well as a pronounced exacerbation of intense, disturbing dreams related to “REM rebound” on discontinuation. Pulmonary specialists sometimes advocate use of an activating TCA such as protriptyline because it may help suppress REM sleep—when sleep apnea episodes may be accentuated—and also provide benefit for the daytime somnolence that many patients with sleep apnea experience.

The Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep

Амисульприд-индуцированная акатизия как маркер нарушения взаимоотношений серотонина и дофамина при ОКР

We report about a clinical observation in a well-characterized group of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) during an experimental medicine study in which a single dose of amisulpride (a selective D2/3 antagonist) was administered. Almost half of the OCD patients, in particular those with less severe obsessive–compulsive symptoms, experienced acute akathisia in response to the amisulpride challenge. This unexpectedly high incidence of akathisia in the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-treated patients with OCD suggests that individual differences in dopamine–serotonin interactions underlie the clinical heterogeneity of OCD, and may thus explain the insufficiency of SSRI monotherapy in those patients not experiencing a satisfactory outcome in symptom reduction. We further speculate about the neuropathology possibly underlying this clinical observation and outline a testable hypothesis for future molecular imaging studies.

 Amisulpride-induced acute akathisia in OCD: an example of dysfunctional dopamine–serotonin interactions?

Предиктор эффективности терапии эсциталопрамом

A recent Loyola study found that the blood test for a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could help predict successful treatment. The researchers found that among depressed patients who had higher than normal levels of VEGF, more than 85 percent experienced partial or complete relief after taking escitalopram (Lexapro).

 Blood Test May Predict Antidepressant Effectiveness

Фармакогенетика СИОЗС, ассоциации между полиморфизмом CYP2D6 и CYP2C19 и ответом на терапию антидепрессантом

An investigation of MEDLINE and other database resources was carried out to summarize the research conducted between 1970 and 2003 in the role of CYP2D6 genetics on SSRI dose exposure.^[2] Area-under-the-concentration curve (AUC) values of 5 SSRIs in poor metabolizers, intermediate metabolizers, and extensive metabolizers as a measure of bioavailability were collected. Dose adjustments were then calculated to compensate for variability in CYP2D6 metabolizer status in white patients. On the basis of metabolizer phenotype, the following dose adjustments were extrapolated for extensive vs poor metabolizers: 33%-129% for fluvoxamine, 66%-114% for paroxetine, 56%-119% for fluoxetine (including the AUC of its active metabolite), 98%-101% for citalopram, and 99-100% for sertraline. A dose adjustment of 130% for paroxetine was extrapolated for ultrarapid metabolizers.

However, the study authors concluded that dose adjustments that are based on CYP2D6 could not be recommended for SSRIs for various reasons. They noted the limited data from multiple dosing, which more accurately reflects the clinical situation; the unknown effect of saturation kinetics of some SSRIs (eg, paroxetine and fluvoxamine); and the long-term effect of inhibition of CYP2D6 by some SSRIs (eg, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine) when given in chronic treatment regimens. Thus, basic human pharmacokinetic data do not strongly support routine clinical use of CYP2D6 testing.

Another study scanning 1200 Web-based articles between 1966 and 2006 for treatment of major depression found no consistent association between CYP2D6 genotype and SSRI metabolism, efficacy, or risk for side effects.^[3]Although 2 studies showed greater nonresponse to SSRIs among ultrarapid metabolizers relative to the general population, the data were inconsistent across other studies. The study authors concluded that there is no established association between plasma drug concentration and SSRI drug response at standard doses.

Finally, a study of SSRI drug response and tolerability in 1953 patients enrolled in the Sequenced Treatment of Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study also showed no significant association between CYP2D6 variants and citalopram response, remission, or tolerability when comparing extensive metabolizers with poor metabolizers. However, the study design included numerous concomitant medications with unknown confounding effects.^[4]

The complexity derived from interaction between multiple CYP enzymes was highlighted in a study of the impact of extensive and poor metabolizer status for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 on the SSRI citalopram. Researchers showed that the AUC for citalopram correlated with the combined CYP2D6/CYP2C19 metabolizer status.^[5] For example, individuals with CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer/CYP2C19 poor metabolizer status showed significantly higher citalopram AUC compared with extensive/extensive metabolizer or poor/extensive metabolizer carriers. Because citalopram metabolism is preferentially catalyzed by CYP2C19 over CYP2D6, consideration of more than 1 genetic variant may be necessary to guide medication dosing decisions.

Pharmacogenomics of SSRIs: Clinical Implications

Влияние нестероидных противовоспалительных средств на антидепрессивное действие СИОЗС

Cytokines may be important in depression. These immunomodulators are produced by glial cells, regulate brain serotonin and noradrenergic systems, and activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Antidepressants increase levels of p11, a specific protein that regulates depression in rodent models and interacts with the serotonin receptor. To learn about possible interactions of antidepressants, cytokines, p11, and anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), researchers conducted experiments in mice and reanalyzed data from the large STAR*D study.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors citalopram and fluoxetine increased p11 levels in mouse frontal cortex, but coadministered ibuprofen (IBU) or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) blocked this increase. IBU lowered plasma citalopram levels. The tricyclic desipramine produced a small p11 increase, which was not affected by IBU or ASA. Antidepressant-related p11 increases were dependent on signaling by two cytokines (interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha). In a mouse model of depression, IBU, ASA, and acetaminophen prevented the behavioral response to SSRIs but not to antidepressants of other types.

Of STAR*D patients who took citalopram for 12 weeks, significantly fewer achieved remission if taking NSAIDs than if not taking NSAIDs (45% vs. 55%). Findings were similar in a comparison of other analgesic use with nonuse (37% vs. 54%).

Do Analgesics Interfere with Efficacy of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors?

НПВС могут снижать эффективность СИОЗС

They then confirmed these effects in a human population. Depressed individuals who reported anti-inflammatory drug use were much less likely to have their symptoms relieved by an antidepressant than depressed patients who reported no anti-inflammatory drug use.

The effect was rather dramatic since, in the absence of any anti-inflammatory or analgesic use, 54 percent of patients responded to the antidepressant, wheh success rates dropped to approximately 40 percent for those who reported using anti-inflammatory agents.

Anti-Inflammatory Meds Can Reduce Antidepressant Effectiveness

механизм работы СИОЗС

In a recent publication in Science, a team of researchers showed a possible mechanism of action for Fluoxetine. According to these scientists, it works through a completely new inhibitory pathway, which can also explain the lengthy and for patients often very frustrating waiting time before SSRIs work clinically. They found that in mice chronically fed with Fluoxetine, the expression of the gene that encodes the blueprint of SERT is reduced, which means less SERT is available to remove serotonin from the synapse. This is a surprising finding in itself, still, the mechanism how Fluoxetine down-regulates the SERT expression is even more surprising.

How Prozac works

PHQ-9

Table 3. PHQ-9

1. Over the past 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following problems?
	Not at all (0)	Several days (1)	More than half the days (2)	Nearly every day (3)
a. Little interest or pleasure in doing things
b. Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless
c. Trouble falling/staying asleep, sleeping too much
d. Feeling tired or having little energy
e. Poor appetite or overeating
f. Feeling bad about yourself -- or that you are a failure or have let yourself or your family down
g. Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching television
h. Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed. Or the opposite -- being so fidgety or restless that you have been moving around a lot more than usual
i. Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way
2. If you checked off any problem on this questionnaire so far, how difficult have these problems made it for you to do your work, take care of things at home, or get along with other people?
	Not difficult at all	Somewhat difficult	Very difficult	Extremely difficult

Table 4. Interpretation of PHQ-9 Results

Score/ Symptom Level	Treatment
0-4 No depression	Consider other diagnoses
5-9 Minimal	▪ Consider other diagnoses ▪ If diagnosis is depression, watchful waiting is appropriate initial management
10-14 Mild	▪ Consider watchful waiting ▪ If active treatment is needed, medication or psychotherapy is equally effective; consider function score in choosing treatment
15-19 Moderate	▪ Active treatment with medication or psychotherapy is recommended ▪ Medication or psychotherapy is equally effective
20-27 Severe	▪ Medication treatment is recommended ▪For many people, psychotherapy is useful as an additional treatment ▪ People with severe symptoms often benefit from consultation with a psychiatrist

Data from Kroenke K, Spitzer R. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32:509-521.

A number of combinations have some benefit in selected patients, including:

• Lithium augmentation at stage 3 of STAR*D resulted in remissions in 15.9%.^[84] Lithium in combination with SSRIs and TCAs also has been effective in placebo-controlled studies, most involving small numbers of subjects. Such treatment requires monitoring of lithium levels, because there is a small difference between therapeutic and toxic levels.^[85]
• Thyroid hormone, and particularly triiodothyronine, has been studied for augmentation with the TCAs. In the STAR*D study, at step 3, augmentation with triiodothyronine led to a remission rate of 24.7%.^[84] Placebo-controlled studies have involved small numbers of subjects and have had mixed results.^[86]
• A heterocyclic-SSRI combination in 1 small study produced more rapid treatment onset and increased the likelihood of remission.^[87] In the study, a combination of fluoxetine and desipramine (a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) was more effective in achieving remission than either drug used as monotherapy: 53.8% for the combination, compared with 7.1% and 0%, respectively. However, such combinations can produce the serotonin syndrome, which is potentially life-threatening, and the dose of the heterocyclic must be adjusted using blood levels because SSRIs increase TCA levels through CYP-450 isoenzyme interactions (eg, fluoxetine increases the levels of desipramine 3- to 4-fold).^[88] Consequently, this augmentation strategy should rarely be considered in primary care.
• Mirtazapine has recently been evaluated in combination therapy with an SSRI (fluoxetine), an SNRI (venlafaxine), or bupropion.^[89] The investigators found that all 3 combinations were more effective than fluoxetine alone in achieving remission (52%, 58%, 46%, respectively, compared with 25%). In patients who responded, double-blind discontinuation resulted in relapse in about 40%. Of note, treatment was initiated with these combinations, rather than mirtazapine being used as an augmenting agent in those not initially responding.
• Methylfolate and folate have been used to augment SSRIs, resulting in increased rates of remission, particularly in women.^[90] The degree to which the response is due to folate deficiency, and whether methylfolate is of greater benefit due to its increased ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, are subject to further research.
• Antidepressants and hypnotics have been used together, with early improvement not only in sleep measures, but also in rates of depression remission.^[91]
• Stimulant drugs have been used as augmentation of heterocyclics or SSRIs.^[92] Of note, in individuals with comorbid medical illness, amphetamine stimulants should be used with caution, particularly if cardiac disease is potentially present.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Strategies to Achieve Remission in Depression

Эффективность антидепрессантов в лечении негативной симптоматики при шизофрении

Background

Treatment of negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia continues to be a major clinical issue.

Aims

To analyse the efficacy of add-on antidepressants for the treatment of negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia.

Method

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of antidepressants and placebo on the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia, measured through standardised rating scales. Outcome was measured as standardised mean difference between end-of-trial and baseline scores of negative symptoms.

Results

There were 23 trials from 22 publications (n = 819). The antidepressants involved were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mirtazapine, reboxetine, mianserin, trazodone and ritanserin; trials on other antidepressants were not available. The overall standardised mean difference was moderate (–0.48) in favour of antidepressants and subgroup analysis revealed significant responses for fluoxetine, trazodone and ritanserin.

Conclusions

Antidepressants along with antipsychotics are more effective in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia than antipsychotics alone.

Efficacy of antidepressants in treating the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: meta-analysis

СИОЗС не рекомендуются при аутизме

SSRIs Not Recommended for Autism in Children or Adults Based on Current Evidence

Pharmacogenetics of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Associated Adverse Drug Reactions

Pharmacogenetics of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Associated Adverse Drug Reactions

Тамокифен и СИОЗС

Some Antidepressants May Thwart Tamoxifen's Effect on Breast Cancer

Клептомания

Additionally, there is some suggestion that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the treatment of choice for obsessive compulsive disorder,may lack efficacy for kleptomania. Instead, other medications (lithium, anti-epileptics, and opioid antagonists) have shown early promise
in treating kleptomania. Evidence suggests that theremay be subtypes of kleptomania that aremore likeOCD, whereas others have more similarities to addictive and mood disorders.
Understanding and Treating Kleptomania:NewModels and New Treatments

терапия деперсонализации

For example, a number of studies suggest that opioid receptor antagonists such as naltrexone and naloxone are useful in at least a subgroup of patients. In spite of initial expectations, the use of lamotrigine as a sole medication has not been found useful. However, open-label trials suggest that its use as an add-on treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is beneficial in a substantial number of patients. Similarly, the use of clonazepam, particularly in conjunction with SSRI antidepressants, appears to be beneficial in patients with high levels of background anxiety.
Depersonalization disorder: pharmacological approaches

Two recent controlled medication trials, one with lamotrigine and one with fluoxetine, failed to show efficacy. There is some evidence for dysregulation of endogenous opioid systems in depersonalization, and a few studies have suggested that opioid antagonists may have efficacy in the treatment of dissociation and depersonalization symptoms. In this prospective open treatment trial, 14 subjects were recruited and treated with naltrexone for 6 weeks to a maximum dose of 100 mg/d (first 7 subjects) or 10 weeks to a maximum dose of 250 mg/d (next 7 subjects). Mean naltrexone dose was 120 mg/d. There was an average 30% reduction of symptoms with treatment, as measured by 3 validated dissociation scales. Three patients were very much improved, and 1 patient was much improved with naltrexone treatment.
An open trial of naltrexone in the treatment of depersonalization disorder