Самидорфан и оланзапин

Topline results from a phase 2 study show that treatment with a novel oral antipsychotic was as effective as treatment with the antipsychotic olanzapine (multiple brands) with far less weight gain in patients with schizophrenia, the company developing the drug announced today.
The drug currently known as ALKS 3831, from Alkermes, combines samidorphan, a novel, potent mu-opioid antagonist, with olanzapine.

Positive Topline Phase 2 Results for Novel Schizophrenia Drug

Оланзапин превзошел ламотриджин в профилактике депрессивной фазы биполярного аффективного расстройства

Background

Bipolar disorder is a highly recurrent disease and has great impact on the function of patients. Depressive symptoms consist of more than 50% of life time during the illness and may lead to self harm or suicidal behaviors. Little is known about the antidepressant effects of olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, as monotherapy despite its indication for preventing manic episodes. In contrast, lamotrigine, a mood stabilizer, has been proven to be effective in preventing depression in patients with bipolar disorder. However, no studies have compared the efficacy between lamotrigine and olanzapine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. This enriched naturalistic study was implemented to assess the effectiveness of olanzapine and lamotrigine as monotherapy in the prevention of recurrence of bipolar disorder.

Methods

Patients with bipolar disorder in a euthymic state (Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score < 12, and 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score < 7) for at least two months, having already received either olanzapine or lamotrigine as the maintenance treatment were recruited. The patients maintained with olanzapine (n = 22) were applied to olanzapine group whereas those maintained with lamotrigine (n = 29) were applied to lamotrigine group. They were followed up for 12 months. Differences in the efficacy between olanzapine and lamotrigine in recurrence prevention were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate time-to-recurrence curves, and differences between the two groups were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

Olanzapine had a significantly lower recurrence rate of depressive episodes than lamotrigine (20.0% vs. 57.7%, chi2 = 6.62, p = .010). However, olanzapine and lamotrigine had similar mania (15.0% vs. 0%, chi2 = 4.17, p = .075, Fisher's exact test) and any mood episode (35.0% vs. 57.7%, chi2 = 2.33, p = .127) recurrence rates. Olanzapine was significantly superior to lamotrigine in the time to recurrence of depressive episodes (chi2 = 4.55, df = 1, p = .033), but there was no difference in the time to recurrence of any mood episode (chi2 = 1.68, df = 1, p = .195).

Conclusions

This prospective naturalistic study suggests that olanzapine is more effective than lamotrigine in the prevention of depressive episodes in patients with bipolar disorder. Future large-scale randomized studies are warranted to validate our results.

 Olanzapine is superior to lamotrigine in the prevention of bipolar depression: a naturalistic observational study

Различия в действии антипсихотиков на обсессивно-компульсивную симптоматику при шизофрении

Indirect evidence supports the assumption that antiserotonergic second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) induce and aggravate obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCS) in schizophrenia. However, multimodal studies assessing the long-term interaction of pharmacotherapy and psychopathology are missing. Over 12 months, we followed-up 75 schizophrenia patients who were classified into two groups according to antipsychotic treatment: clozapine or olanzapine (group I) versus aripiprazole or amisulpride (group II). We applied the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and investigated between-group changes over time as the primary endpoint. Group I showed markedly higher YBOCS scores at both time points. Repeated measure analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed significant interaction effects of group and time (per protocol sample (PP): p=0.006). This was due to persistently high OCS severity within group I, and decreasing YBOCS scores within group II. OCS severity correlated significantly with the negative and general psychopathology subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), as well as with depressive symptoms. The progressive differences in OCS severity between our groups support the assumption of differential pharmacodynamic effects on comorbid OCS in schizophrenia. Further studies should address the pathogenetic mechanism, define patients at risk and facilitate early detection as well as therapeutic interventions.

Differential effects of antipsychotic agents on obsessive–compulsive symptoms in schizophrenia: a longitudinal study

Антидепрессивные свойства оланзапина

Background

Atypical antipsychotics are widely used in bipolar mania. However, the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression has not been comprehensively explored.

Aims

To evaluate olanzapine monotherapy in patients with bipolar depression.

Method

Patients with bipolar depression received olanzapine (5–20 mg/day, n = 343) or placebo (n = 171) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was change from baseline to end-point in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Secondary outcomes included: Clinical Global Impression – Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) scale, 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores, and the rate of response (50% reduction in MADRS at end-point), recovery (MADRS 12 for 4 weeks plus treatment completion) and remission (MADRS 8). The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00510146).

Results

Olanzapine demonstrated: significantly greater (P < 0.04) improvements on MADRS (least-squares mean change –13.82 v. –11.67), HRSD-17 and YMRS total scores and all CGI-BP subscale scores v. placebo; significantly (P⩽0.05) more response and remission, but not recovery; significantly (P < 0.01) greater mean increases in weight, fasting cholesterol and triglycerides; and significantly more (P < 0.001) patients gained ⩾7% body weight.

Conclusions

Olanzapine monotherapy appears to be efficacious in bipolar depression. Additional long-term studies are warranted to confirm these results. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of olanzapine.

 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of olanzapine in patients with bipolar I depression*

Бетагистин как корректор увеличения массы тела при приёме оланзапина

Olanzapine is effective at treating multiple domains of schizophrenia symptoms. However, it induces serious metabolic side effects. Antipsychotic drug’s antagonistic affinity to histamine H1 receptors has been identified as a main contributor for weight gain/obesity side effects. This study therefore investigated whether a combined treatment of betahistine (a H1 receptor agonist and H3 receptor antagonist) could reduce the body weight/obesity induced by olanzapine. Female Sprague Dawley rats were treated orally with olanzapine (1 mg/kg, t.i.d.) and/or betahistine (2.67 mg/kg, t.i.d.), or vehicle for two weeks. Rats treated with olanzapine exhibited significant body weight gain and increased food intake. Co-treatment of olanzapine with betahistine significantly prevented (-45%) weight gain and reduced feeding efficiency compared to sole olanzapine treatment. Betahistine treatment alone had no effect on weight gain and food intake. Olanzapine reduced locomotor activity, but not betahistine. These findings demonstrate that olanzapine-induced body weight gain can partially be reduced by co-treatment with betahistine. Betahistine has H3 receptor antagonistic effects to increase histamine release, which may augment its direct agonistic effects on H1 receptors. These findings have important implications for clinical trials using betahistine to control antipsychotic-induced obesity side effects.

 Reducing olanzapine-induced weight gain side effect by using betahistine: a study in the rat model

Арипиразол, кветиапин и оланзапин в терапии биполярной депрессии

Seven published papers were identified on the use of aripiprazole, olanzapine and quetiapine. Internal validity of the trials was fairly good, external validity only moderate. Different outcome measures of efficacy and safety were assessed. When the individual trials were looked at, quetiapine and to a lesser extent olanzapine demonstrated significant improvement in MADRS (Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) total scores. This was not demonstrated for aripiprazole. Efficacy was hampered by adverse events, such as weight gain, akathisia and somnolence/sedation. Both clinical heterogeneity of the included trials and statistical heterogeneity of the meta-analytic data were considerable. The number of quetiapine trials was disproportionate to the number of trials of aripiprazole and olanzapine. Further research is needed to assess differential efficacy of the different SGAs and their use in clinical practice.

Second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Приверженность лечению клозапином и пролонгированными формами антипсихотиков в сравнении с пероральным олонзапином

They found an 83% lower risk for all-cause discontinuation of clozapine than for oral olanzapine (Zyprexa, Eli Lilly and Co.) treatment. "Patient adherence with clozapine and the LAI antipsychotics is much better than with oral olanzapine, which has been considered the most efficacious drug, according to the 2005 Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study," Dr. Kroken said.

... 

"This has to do with the formulation; patients allow prescribing to continue for longer on LAIs than on orals. This might also be due to...seeing a clinician every 2 weeks," said Dr. Patel.

Adherence Better With Clozapine and LAI Antipsychotics

Ранняя диагностика шизофрении

The study of the preventive potential of pre-onset or psychosis-risk intervention requires a common and reliable diagnosis of a risk syndrome with which to construct samples that we can track and treat and that can be replicated by independent clinical investigators. Yung and McGorry10 created the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), a structured interview for diagnosing the psychosis-risk syndrome. Our team at Yale developed the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS); this tool is used to rate the severity/frequency of key prodromal symptoms and can be used to determine the presence or absence of several psychosis-risk syndromes. It can also be used to estimate the severity of these symptoms and syndromes, including the boundary of transition from the prodrome to psychosis, called “conversion.”
The interrater reliability of the SIPS is satisfactory. Moreover, the SIPS has proved to be a valid predictor of psychosis insofar as psychosis developed over the next 2.5 years in approximately 33% of a large sample of treatment-seeking persons meeting SIPS criteria. In essence, approximately 1 of 3 persons who met an SIPS prodromal diagnosis became psychotic, which amounts to a risk for psychosis that is more than 400 times the risk for the average individual. Some of the remaining two-thirds of the sample who met an SIPS prodromal diagnosis and in whom psychosis did not develop remained prodromally symptomatic and eventually met criteria for schizotypal personality disorder; in others, Axis I disorders, such as depression, developed; and in many, prodromal symptoms remitted with time without sequelae (J. Addington et al, unpublished data, 2010).

Treatment research in psychosis risk has just begun, and initial findings show promise. Combined antipsychotic (risperidone) and individual psychotherapy, antipsychotic therapy alone (olanzapine), and psychotherapy (cognitive-behavioral therapy) alone all show that onset of psychosis in prodromal samples can be delayed, but often with substantial adverse effects (eg, weight gain with olanzapine). Most recently, a randomized trial of v-3 fatty acids delayed onset of psychosis with virtually no adverse effects. In this study, the risk to benefit ratio is remarkably good, and if the results can be replicated, they should essentially eliminate concerns about untoward adverse effects in false-positive cases. Overall, however, many more treatment studies are needed before integrated guidelines can be formulated.

Early Antecedents and Detection of Schizophrenia

Оланзапин при резистентной мании

Objective

To examine the safety and efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy in treatment-resistant bipolar mania.
Method

Subjects (n = 18) who were acutely manic, did not respond to lithium, anticonvulsants, and neuroleptics, and/or had intolerable side effects to them in previous manic episodes were openly treated with olanzapine monotherapy (5–40 mg/d) for 12 weeks. The primary and secondary outcomes included the change from baseline to endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score, Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder-Severity Scale (CGI-S), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and response and remission rate.
Results

The mean change in YMRS total score from baseline to endpoint was −23.3 ± 8.4 (p < 0.001). Fifteen (88.5%) patients achieved response (≥50% reduction in YMRS total score) and 14 (77.8%) achieved remission (YMRS total score ≤9 at endpoint). Mean changes from baseline to endpoint in CGI-S for mania and PANSS total score were significant, but not the changes in HAM-D total score or CGI-S for depression. The most common adverse events were sedation, self-reported weight gain, ≥7% increase in body weight, dizziness, and akathisia.

Safety and efficacy of olanzapine monotherapy in treatment-resistant bipolar mania: a 12-week open-label study

Сравнение антидепрессивной эффективности антипсихотиков у психотических больных

There was no substantial difference in anti-depressive effectiveness among olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone in this clinically relevant sample of patients acutely admitted to hospital for symptoms of psychosis. Based on our findings we can make no recommendations concerning choice of any particular SGA for targeting symptoms of depression in a patient acutely admitted with psychosis.

Anti-depressive effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone: a pragmatic, randomized trial.

Депо-формы антипсихотиков при первом эпизоде шизофрении

OBJECTIVE: Data on the effectiveness of antipsychotics in the early phase of schizophrenia are limited. The authors examined the risk of rehospitalization and drug discontinuation in a nationwide cohort of 2,588 consecutive patients hospitalized for the first time with a diagnosis of schizophrenia between 2000 and 2007 in Finland.

METHOD: The authors linked national databases of hospitalization, mortality, and antipsychotic prescriptions and computed hazard ratios, adjusting for the effects of sociodemographic and clinical variables, the temporal sequence of the antipsychotics used, and the choice of the initial antipsychotic for each patient.

RESULTS: Of 2,588 patients, 1,507 (58.2%) collected a prescription for an antipsychotic during the first 30 days after hospital discharge, and 1,182 (45.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]=43.7–47.6) continued their initial treatment for 30 days or longer. In a pairwise comparison between depot injections and their equivalent oral formulations, the risk of rehospitalization for patients receiving depot medications was about one-third of that for patients receiving oral medications (adjusted hazard ratio=0.36, 95% CI=0.17–0.75). Compared with oral risperidone, clozapine (adjusted hazard ratio=0.48, 95% CI=0.31–0.76) and olanzapine (adjusted hazard ratio=0.54, 95% CI=0.40–0.73) were each associated with a significantly lower rehospitalization risk. Use of any antipsychotic compared with no antipsychotic was associated with lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio=0.45, 95% CI=0.31–0.67).

CONCLUSIONS: In Finland, only a minority of patients adhere to their initial antipsychotic during the first 60 days after discharge from their first hospitalization for schizophrenia. Use of depot antipsychotics was associated with a significantly lower risk of rehospitalization than use of oral formulations of the same compounds. Among oral antipsychotics, clozapine and olanzapine were associated with more favorable outcomes. Use of any antipsychotic was associated with lower mortality.

A Nationwide Cohort Study of Oral and Depot Antipsychotics After First Hospitalization for Schizophrenia

Индивидуальные различия в ответе на терапию оланзапином

The antipsychotic drug, olanzapine, one of the most widely used drugs in clinical medicine, has a high rate of discontinuation due to inefficacy and/or adverse effects. We identified a single nucleotide polymorphism in the drug metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P450 3A43 (CYP3A43; rs472660), that highly significantly predicted olanzapine clearance in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness trial (P=5.9e−7). Moreover, at standard antipsychotic doses, 50% of individuals with the high clearance genotype (AA) have trough blood levels below the therapeutic range. Interestingly, a much higher proportion of African Americans carry the A allele compared with Caucasians (allele frequency 67 vs 14%). After accounting for CYP3A43 genotype, race is no longer a significant predictor of olanzapine clearance. Olanzapine clearance was associated with measures of clinical response. Patients with greater clearance had higher symptom ratings and were more likely to discontinue treatment due to an inadequate response. Our data identify a genetic mechanism for variation in olanzapine response and demonstrate that blood level monitoring of olanzapine treatment is advisable.

Genetic variation in CYP3A43 explains racial difference in olanzapine clearance

Социальное функционирование при долгосрочном приёме антипсихотиков, преимущества оланзапина

Background
When treating schizophrenia, improving patients' productivity level is a major goal considering schizophrenia is a leading cause of functional disability. Productivity level has been identified as the most preferred treatment outcome by patients with schizophrenia. However, little has been done to systematically investigate productivity levels in schizophrenia. We set out to better understand the change in productivity level among chronically ill patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine compared with other antipsychotic medications. We also assessed the links between productivity level and other clinical outcomes.

Methods
This post hoc analysis used data from 6 randomized, double-blind clinical trials of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with each trial being of approximately 6 months duration. Change in productivity level was compared between olanzapine-treated patients (HGBG, n=172; HGHJ, n=277; HGJB, n=171; HGLB, n=281; HGGN, n=159; HGDH, n=131) and patients treated with other antipsychotic medications (separately vs. haloperidol [HGGN, n=97; HGDH, n=132], risperidone [HGBG, n=167; HGGN, n=158], quetiapine [HGJB, n=175], ziprasidone [HGHJ, n=271] and aripiprazole [HGLB, n=285]). Productivity was defined as functional activities/work including working for pay, studying, housekeeping and volunteer work. Productivity level in the prior 3 months was assessed on a 5-point scale ranging from no useful functioning to functional activity/work 75% to 100% of the time.

Results
Chronically ill patients treated with olanzapine (OLZ) experienced significantly greater improvement in productivity when compared to patients treated with risperidone (RISP) (OLZ= 0.22+/-1.19, RISP=-0.03+/-1.17, p=0.033) or ziprasidone (ZIP) (OLZ=0.50+/-1.38, ZIP=0.25+/-1.27, p=0.026), but did not significantly differ from the ziprasidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole or haloperidol treatment groups. Among first episode patients, OLZ therapy was associated with greater improvements in productivity levels compared to haloperidol (HAL), during the acute phase (OLZ=-0.31+/-1.59, HAL=-0.69+/-1.56, p=0.011) and over the long-term (OLZ=0.10+/-1.50, HAL=-0.32+/-1.91, p=0.008). Significantly more chronically ill and first episode patients treated with olanzapine showed moderately high (>50%-75% of the time) and high levels of productivity (>75%-100% of the time) at endpoint, when compared to risperidone- or haloperidol-treated patients (p<.05), respectively. Higher productivity level was associated with significantly higher study completion rates and better scores on the positive, negative, disorganized thoughts, hostility and depression subscales of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS).

Conclusions
Some antipsychotic medications significantly differed in beneficial impact on productivity level in the long-term treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Findings further highlight the link between clinical and functional outcomes, showing significant associations between higher productivity, lower symptom severity and better persistence on therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00088049; NCT00036088

Change in Level of Productivity in the Treatment of Schizophrenia with Olanzapine or Other Antipsychotics

Метаболические расстройства коморбидные с БАР

Chronic stress, which patients experience during both the manic and the depressive phases of bipolar disorder, is associated with increased cortisol levels, lack of cortisol suppression, and changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses. This metabolic dysregulation may increase insulin resistance and can lead to hyperglycemia, increased oxidative stress, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerosis. In addition, patients with bipolar illness have increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system, which may also lead to insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and increased risk of sudden cardiac death.2

Depressive syndromes may be neurotoxic. Abnormalities in cellular plasticity, cellular resilience, and intracellular signaling, as well as alterations in the size, shape, and density of neurons and glia, have been found. Studies employing neuroimaging and neuropsychological tests have demonstrated abnormalities in brain morphology and function in patient populations with depressive syndromes and in those with diabetes. Common physiologic mechanisms have been implicated, including insulin-glucose homeostasis, immuno-inflammatory processes, and oxidative stress mechanisms.


Metabolic Comorbidities in Patients With Bipolar Disorder

Блокирование 5-HT7 рецепторов как потенциальный механизм быстрого антидепрессивного эффекта

Current antidepressants still display unsatisfactory efficacy and a delayed onset of therapeutic action. Here we show that the pharmacological blockade of serotonin 7 (5-HT7) receptors produced a faster antidepressant-like response than the commonly prescribed antidepressant fluoxetine. In the rat, the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB-269970 counteracted the anxiogenic-like effect of fluoxetine in the open field and exerted an antidepressant-like effect in the forced swim test. In vivo, 5-HT7 receptors negatively regulate the firing activity of dorsal raphe 5-HT neurons and become desensitized after long-term administration of fluoxetine. In contrast with fluoxetine, a 1-week treatment with SB-269970 did not alter 5-HT firing activity but desensitized cell body 5-HT autoreceptors, enhanced the hippocampal cell proliferation, and counteracted the depressive-like behavior in olfactory bulbectomized rats. Finally, unlike fluoxetine, early-life administration of SB-269970, did not induce anxious/depressive-like behaviors in adulthood. Together, these findings indicate that the 5-HT7 receptor antagonists may represent a new class of antidepressants with faster therapeutic action.

Pharmacological Blockade of 5-HT7 Receptors as a Putative Fast Acting Antidepressant Strategy

Significant Weight Gain Associated with Post-Clozapine Antipsychotics

Significant Weight Gain* Associated with Post-Clozapine Antipsychotics
*≥7% body weight increase vs placebo; 4-8 week trials

Эффективность атипичных антипсихотиков при делирии

Haloperidol is the mainstay of delirium treatment.8 Compared with atypical antipsychotics in delirium treatment, haloperidol doses < 3.5 mg/d have not been associated with an increase in extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS).9

Although not devoid of side effects, atypical antipsychotics are an alternative to haloperidol.8,10 This article briefly summarizes the current evidence on the use of atypicals for treating delirium.

Evidence for antipsychotics

Haloperidol has been the antipsychotic of choice for treating delirium symptoms. It is recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine7 and is regarded as safe, cost-effective, and efficacious for delirium5 despite a risk of dose-related EPS and potential cardiac conduction alterations.5,14

Risperidone is not indicated for treating delirium but is one of the most extensively studied atypical antipsychotic alternatives to haloperidol. Evidence consisting primarily of case reports has illustrated the potential efficacy of risperidone in treating delirium (Table 2).10,15-19

Clinical Point

In a small double-blind, randomized trial, risperidone was effective but not significantly more so than low-dose haloperidol

In 2004, Parellada et al17 observed significant mean improvements in all measures (Delirium Rating Scale [DRS], Mini-Mental State Exam [MMSE], positive subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS-P], and Clinical Global Impressions scale [CGI]) in 64 delirium patients treated with risperidone. In a 2004 double-blind trial of 28 delirium patients randomly assigned to risperidone or haloperidol, risperidone was effective but not significantly more efficacious than low-dose haloperidol for acute delirium treatment.18

Advantages of using risperidone include its lack of anticholinergic effects. Potential side effects include dose-related EPS and weight gain, which were observed in patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders and dementia-related behavioral disorders.20,21

Olanzapine. Much like risperidone, olanzapine’s use in delirium is relatively well described in the literature (Table 3).22-24 In a randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing olanzapine with haloperidol, 175 patients were treated for 7 days with olanzapine, haloperidol, or placebo. Olanzapine and haloperidol showed significantly greater DRS score improvement than placebo.24 There was no difference between olanzapine and haloperidol outcomes; however, olanzapine showed significant improvement by days 2 and 3 compared with haloperidol. Haloperidol was associated with a significantly higher rate of dystonia compared with olanzapine.

Olanzapine carries a risk of anticholinergic effects. This can be a drawback, especially in patients such as Ms. B whose delirium has an anticholinergic component. Olanzapine is available in an IM formulation, which can be an advantage when addressing agitation and medical comorbidities of delirium.

Quetiapine. Case reports have suggested quetiapine is effective for delirium (Table 4).10,25-27 In a prospective, open-label trial, Sasaki et al26 treated 12 delirium patients with a single bedtime dose of quetiapine. All patients achieved remission within several days of beginning quetiapine, and the drug was well tolerated with no detected EPS or excessive sedation.

Clinical Point

Quetiapine reduced delirium duration and agitation in a small double-blind randomized trial of adult ICU patients

In 2010 Devlin et al27 reported on the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 36 adult ICU patients. Compared with those receiving placebo, patients taking quetiapine had a statistically significant shorter time to first resolution of delirium, reduced duration of delirium, and less agitation as measured by the Sedation-Agitation Scale. Mortality, ICU length of stay, and incidence of QTc prolongation did not differ, but patients treated with quetiapine were more likely to be discharged home or to rehabilitation and to have more somnolence. Quetiapine’s side effect profile includes a low occurrence of EPS, sedation, and dose-related anticholinergic effects.25

Ziprasidone. The literature on ziprasidone for delirium so far is limited to a few anecdotal case reports (Table 5).28-31 In 2002, Leso and Schwartz28 successfully used ziprasidone to treat delirium in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus and cryptococcal meningitis. Ziprasidone was chosen for its lack of sedating effects and low EPS risk. The patient experienced significant clearing of his delirium and lowering of his DRS score. Ziprasidone eventually was discontinued because a fluctuating QTc interval associated with comorbid electrolyte imbalances—a potential drawback to ziprasidone.

In the case of Ms. B, ziprasidone appeared to be efficacious; however, improvement in her medical condition, rather than ziprasidone treatment, is the most likely explanation for the resolution of her delirium symptoms.

Aripiprazole. Alao et al30 reported on 2 delirium patients treated with 30 mg and 15 mg aripiprazole; improvement was monitored using the MMSE and DRS (Table 5).28-31 In both cases, confusion, disorientation, and agitation improved within 7 days of treatment. In the first case, the patient’s MMSE score improved from 5 to 28 and his DRS score decreased from 28 to 6. The second patient’s MMSE score improved from 7 to 27 and her DRS score went from 18 to 6.

Straker et al31 reported on 14 delirium patients treated with aripiprazole. Twelve patients had a ≥50% reduction in DRS, Revised-98 scores, and 13 showed improvement on CGI scores. The rate of adverse side effects was low. Three patients had prolonged QTc interval, but no patients developed arrhythmia or discontinued aripiprazole.

Atypical antipsychotics for delirium: A reasonable alternative to haloperidol?

Антипсихотики второго поколения в терапии депрессии

Abstract

Purpose of review The aim of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD).
Recent findings In MDD, SGA monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to conventional antidepressants showed rapid onset of antidepressant efficacy. Although maintenance data are limited, quetiapine monotherapy, risperidone adjunctive therapy, and amisulpride adjunctive therapy significantly delayed the time to relapse as compared with placebo. In general, extrapyramidal symptoms appeared to be low with SGAs, but a higher incidence of akathisia was observed with aripiprazole. An elevated risk of weight gain was observed with olanzapine–fluoxetine combination, risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine compared with placebo. At present, there are insufficient data to confidently distinguish between different SGAs in the treatment of MDD. A recent meta-analysis found that adjunctive SGAs were significantly more effective than placebo, but differences in efficacy were not identified among the studied agents, nor were outcomes affected by trial duration or the method of establishing treatment resistance.
Summary Both SGA monotherapy and adjunctive therapy showed greater efficacy in the treatment of MDD than placebo, but augmentation is more widely utilized in treatment-resistant depression. Clinicians should routinely monitor for cardiometabolic side-effects and extrapyramidal symptoms during SGA therapy.

Quetiapine

The efficacy and safety of QTP-XR monotherapy in the treatment of MDD were evaluated in two 8-week, placebo-controlled RCTs.[7••,8•] In the first trial, QTP-XR 150 or 300 mg/day and duloxetine 60 mg/day were compared with placebo.[7••] All active treatment arms demonstrated significant improvement in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)[27] total scores compared with that of placebo at week 6. Significant improvement in depressive symptoms occurred at the end of week 1 with both QTP-XR 150 mg/day (−8.4, P < 0.01) and 300 mg/day (−8.2, P < 0.01) compared with placebo (−6.0), but not duloxetine 60 mg/day (−6.8, P = 0.30). At study endpoint (week 6), remission rates (MADRS ≤ 8) were significantly higher in the QTP-XR 300 mg/day (32.0%, P < 0.05) and duloxetine 60 mg/day groups (31.9%, P < 0.05) vs. placebo (20.4%), but not for QTP-XR 150 mg/day (26.5%, P = 0.27).
Sulpiride and Amisulpride

Apart from QTP-XR, SLP and ASLP are the only other SGAs that have been studied as monotherapy treatment for MDD in placebo-controlled trials. A moderately sized (n = 88) study found greater reduction in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-21)[28] total score from baseline to endpoint in the SLP group (−10, P = 0.0007) than in placebo (−8). The only RCT of ASLP in the acute treatment of MDD compared a fixed dosage of ASLP 50 mg/day (n = 136) with paroxetine 20 mg/day (n = 136).[11] No statistically significant differences occurred between the two treatments, but a placebo group was not included to establish internal validity.[11] A long-term (6-month), fixed-dosage, placebo-controlled RCT in mild or moderate MDD or dysthymia compared the efficacy and safety of ASLP (50 mg/day) with imipramine (100 mg/day) and placebo.[12] Analysis of the primary outcome showed the mean change in MADRS total scores in both active treatment arms was significantly larger than that of placebo, although remission rates did not reach the level of statistical significance.

Second-generation Antipsychotics in Major Depressive Disorder: Update and Clinical Perspective

Сравнение атипичных антипсихотиков

For example, when switching from a tightly binding anticholinergic or antihistaminergic medication (eg, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine) to one with less anticholinergic or antihistaminergic affinity (eg, aripiprazole, risperidone, ziprasidone), often transient rebound anxiety, insomnia, agitation and restlessness can occur. In addition, when switching from a tighter D2 binding agent to a looser-binding agent (eg, from risperidone to clozapine or quetiapine) or, particularly, to a partial dopamine agonist (eg aripiprazole) dopamine rebound symptoms, such as often transient worsening of psychosis, mania or aggression/agitation, can occur. A pharmacokinetic dopamine rebound may also occur when switching from a short half-life antipsychotic to a longer half-life antipsychotic (Table 1).4

The abrupt switch has the greatest potential for rebound and withdrawal phenomena. Even the conventional cross-titration can lead to problems when the pre-switch antipsychotic has a shorter half life and/or blocks more tightly cholinergic, histaminergic or dopaminergic receptors than the post-switch antipsychotic. Rebound phenomena can be minimized by avoiding abrupt or fast switching when the pre- and post-switch receptor affinities and/or half-lives differ considerably. Instead, an overlapping or “plateau” switch should be used. This consists of decreasing the pre-switch antipsychotic slowly (eg, 25–50% every 5 half-lives) and only after the post-switch antipsychotic has reached steady state (ie, ≤5 half lives on target dose). Adding calming medications during the switch period, such as benzodiazepines, antihistamines or sleep aides, can also minimize rebound phenomena.

A number of non-antipsychotic augmentation strategies have also been tested in schizophrenia patients with insufficient response to antipsychotic monotherapy. Of these, lithium,16 carbamazepine,17 and beta blockers18 were not superior to placebo when added to an antipsychotic. Similarly, benzodiazepine19 and valproate augmentation20 also did not show long-term superiority compared to placebo, although both agents might speed up the initial response. Although two large-scale studies showed no superiority of lamotrigine augmentation of antipsychotics compared to placebo,21 a meta-analysis demonstrated significant superiority regarding global ratings of psychopathology, positive and negative symptom change, as well as study-defined response when outcomes of patients were combined in whom lamotrigine was added to clozapine.22 This, however, has not been verified in a prospective study.

ECT augmentation has also been shown to be superior, both for acute efficacy and in maintenance treatment, when added to antipsychotic monotherapy in patients who have failed antipsychotic monotherapy.23

One meta-analysis suggested that augmentation of antipsychotics with antidepressants may be more helpful than placebo for schizophrenia patients with predominantly negative symptoms.24 Larger, validating studies are needed, however, and specific effects on negative symptoms need to be distinguished from proven effects of antidepressants on depressive symptoms in schizophrenia patients.25

Practical Dosing Strategies in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Part 2 - Switching and Combining Antipsychotics

Потенциирование клозапина: сульпирид, амисульприд, ламотриджин

A frequent treatment strategy for clozapine-resistant patients with schizophrenia is the use of specific augmentors that are suitable for adjunctive therapy. Clozapine is a polyvalent drug but it lacks high-potency dopamine receptor blockade (Kerwin & Osborne, 2000). Therefore, there has been interest in using as augmentors substituted benzamides with highly selective dopamine receptor blocking profiles (Kerwin, 2000). Augmentation strategies incorporating sulpiride are well documented. The authors of one study of sulpiride augmentation in 28 patients partially responsive to clozapine (Shiloh et al, 1997) noted a mean reduction of about 40–50% in various clinical response scores (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms).

Several groups have been interested in mimicking this study with amisulpride, a relative of sulpiride that is even more selective at the dopamine D2 receptor. A case series by Zink et al(2004) showed improvement in previously treatment-resistant symptoms following a combined treatment strategy of clozapine and amisulpride. In addition, our group performed an open trial of amisulpride augmentation in a long-term (52 weeks) study. Significant improvement was observed in half of the patients, with no additional side-effects. Moreover, this study monitored plasma levels to determine whether this was a pharmacokinetic interaction. Clozapine levels did not change throughout the duration of the trial, suggesting a pharmacodynamic interaction (Munro et al, 2004).

Augmentation with anti-epileptics
A glutamate hyperfunction hypothesis of schizophrenia has generated interest in the role of glutamate release inhibitors as clozapine augmentors. In a study of 26 treatment-resistant patients receiving lamotrigine (17) or topirimate (9) in addition to their existing antipsychotic treatment (a variety of antipsychotics), a significant improvement was observed when lamotrigine was added to risperidone, haloperidol, olanzapine or flupenthixol. However, no significant effect was observed in patients receiving topirimate augmentation in addition to clozapine, olanzapine, haloperidol or flupenthixol (Dursun & Deakin, 2001). The therapeutic effects of lamotrigine augmentation were also assessed in a rigorous randomised placebo-controlled cross-over study of 34 clozapine-resistant patients (Tiihonen et al, 2003). In this 14-week study, lamotrigine treatment significantly improved positive symptoms and general psychopathological symptoms, but had no effect on negative symptoms. The authors suggested that this was the first time a non-dopamine antagonist had proven efficacy in schizophrenia, giving further credence to the hyperglutamate neurotransmission hypothesis for the generation of positive symptoms in the disorder.

Management of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia