N-ацетилцистеин как корректор раздражительности при детском аутизме

Background

This study examined the efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) augmentation for treating irritability in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

Method

Forty children and adolescents met diagnostic criteria for ASD according to DSM-IV. They were randomly allocated into one of the two groups of NAC (1200mg/day)+risperidone or placebo+risperidone. NAC and placebo were administered in the form of effervescent and in two divided doses for 8 weeks. Irritability subscale score of Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) was considered as the main outcome measure. Adverse effects were also checked.

Results

The mean score of irritability in the NAC+risperidone and placebo+risperidone groups at baseline was 13.2(5.3) and 16.7(7.8), respectively. The scores after 8 weeks were 9.7(4.1) and 15.1(7.8), respectively. Repeated measures of ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference between the two groups after 8 weeks. The most common adverse effects in the NAC+risperidone group were constipation (16.1%), increased appetite (16.1%), fatigue (12.9%), nervousness (12.9%), and daytime drowsiness (12.9%). There was no fatal adverse effect.

Conclusions

Risperidone plus NAC more than risperidone plus placebo decreased irritability in children and adolescents with ASD. Meanwhile, it did not change the core symptoms of autism. Adverse effects were not common and NAC was generally tolerated well.

A randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial of N-Acetylcysteine added to risperidone for treating autistic disorders

Индивидуальные предпочтения в фармакотерапии среди врачей-психиатров

BACKGROUND:
Psychiatrists' preference for certain medications is not only determined by their efficacy and side effect profile but may also depend on the psychiatrists' beliefs about specific therapeutic effects based on their own observation and experience. We aimed to evaluate which antipsychotic or antidepressant drugs psychiatrists would prefer for themselves, their partners and children in case of a mental illness.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
The study was conducted among psychiatrists in Serbia. The sample consisted of 90 psychiatrists who were asked to complete the questionnaire about their drug selection in hypothetical situations of becoming ill with schizophrenia or depression or these conditions occurring in their partners and children.
RESULTS:
In case of schizophrenia, risperidone was the first choice made by most psychiatrists for themselves, their partners or children, followed by clozapine, haloperidol and olanzapine. In case of depression, SSRIs and SNRIs were generally favored, with sertraline and escitalopram being the preferred medications for psychiatrists, partners and their children. With regards to depression, 82.3% of participants would opt for an antidepressant as monotherapy or in combination, but 13.3% would opt for anxiolytic monotherapy. The preferred doses were slightly lower than the recommended ones, especially for antipsychotic agents.
CONCLUSIONS:
Most psychiatrists would take or administer atypical antipsychotics or SSRIs as the first choice for themselves, their partners or children. These preferences are mostly in accordance with current treatment guidelines, but there is still room to narrow the gap between guideline recommendations and psychiatrists' medication choices in personally meaningful situations.

 Psychiatrists' psychotropic drug prescription preferences for themselves or their family members.

Исследование вторичной негативной симптоматики при приёме антипсихотиков

OBJECTIVE: Despite the clinical observation that antipsychotics can produce negative symptoms, no previous controlled study, to our knowledge, has evaluated this action in healthy subjects. The present study assessed observer-rated and self-rated negative symptoms produced by conventional and second-generation antipsychotics in healthy volunteers. METHOD: The authors used a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single doses of haloperidol (5 mg) and risperidone (2.5 mg) in normal subjects. Thirty-two subjects were administered haloperidol, risperidone, and placebo in a random order. Motor variables and observer-rated negative symptoms were assessed after 3–4 hours and subjective negative symptoms and drowsiness after 24 hours. RESULTS: Neither of the active drugs caused significant motor extrapyramidal symptoms after administration. Haloperidol caused significantly more negative signs and symptoms than placebo on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and two self-rated negative symptom scales: the Subjective Deficit Syndrome Scale total score and an analog scale that evaluates subjective negative symptoms. Risperidone caused significantly more negative signs and symptoms than placebo on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the SANS, the Subjective Deficit Syndrome Scale total score, and the analog scale for subjective negative symptoms. After control for drowsiness, risperidone but not haloperidol produced more negative symptoms than placebo on the BPRS and the SANS. Significance was lost for the subjective negative symptoms with both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of both haloperidol and risperidone produce negative symptoms in normal individuals. Drowsiness may be an important confounding factor in the assessment of negative symptoms in antipsychotic trials.

Negative Signs and Symptoms Secondary to Antipsychotics: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of a Single Dose of Placebo, Haloperidol, and Risperidone in Healthy Volunteers

Ранняя диагностика шизофрении

The study of the preventive potential of pre-onset or psychosis-risk intervention requires a common and reliable diagnosis of a risk syndrome with which to construct samples that we can track and treat and that can be replicated by independent clinical investigators. Yung and McGorry10 created the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), a structured interview for diagnosing the psychosis-risk syndrome. Our team at Yale developed the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS); this tool is used to rate the severity/frequency of key prodromal symptoms and can be used to determine the presence or absence of several psychosis-risk syndromes. It can also be used to estimate the severity of these symptoms and syndromes, including the boundary of transition from the prodrome to psychosis, called “conversion.”
The interrater reliability of the SIPS is satisfactory. Moreover, the SIPS has proved to be a valid predictor of psychosis insofar as psychosis developed over the next 2.5 years in approximately 33% of a large sample of treatment-seeking persons meeting SIPS criteria. In essence, approximately 1 of 3 persons who met an SIPS prodromal diagnosis became psychotic, which amounts to a risk for psychosis that is more than 400 times the risk for the average individual. Some of the remaining two-thirds of the sample who met an SIPS prodromal diagnosis and in whom psychosis did not develop remained prodromally symptomatic and eventually met criteria for schizotypal personality disorder; in others, Axis I disorders, such as depression, developed; and in many, prodromal symptoms remitted with time without sequelae (J. Addington et al, unpublished data, 2010).

Treatment research in psychosis risk has just begun, and initial findings show promise. Combined antipsychotic (risperidone) and individual psychotherapy, antipsychotic therapy alone (olanzapine), and psychotherapy (cognitive-behavioral therapy) alone all show that onset of psychosis in prodromal samples can be delayed, but often with substantial adverse effects (eg, weight gain with olanzapine). Most recently, a randomized trial of v-3 fatty acids delayed onset of psychosis with virtually no adverse effects. In this study, the risk to benefit ratio is remarkably good, and if the results can be replicated, they should essentially eliminate concerns about untoward adverse effects in false-positive cases. Overall, however, many more treatment studies are needed before integrated guidelines can be formulated.

Early Antecedents and Detection of Schizophrenia

Сравнение антидепрессивной эффективности антипсихотиков у психотических больных

There was no substantial difference in anti-depressive effectiveness among olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone in this clinically relevant sample of patients acutely admitted to hospital for symptoms of psychosis. Based on our findings we can make no recommendations concerning choice of any particular SGA for targeting symptoms of depression in a patient acutely admitted with psychosis.

Anti-depressive effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone: a pragmatic, randomized trial.

Депо-формы классических антипсихотиков превосходят по эффективности пролонгированную форму рисперидона

In a large population-based cohort study, conventional depot antipsychotics turned out to be superior to risperidone long-acting injection, Danish researchers reported here at the New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit (NCDEU) 51st Annual Meeting, sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Older Antipsychotics Trump Newer Agents for Schizophrenia

Метаболические расстройства коморбидные с БАР

Chronic stress, which patients experience during both the manic and the depressive phases of bipolar disorder, is associated with increased cortisol levels, lack of cortisol suppression, and changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses. This metabolic dysregulation may increase insulin resistance and can lead to hyperglycemia, increased oxidative stress, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerosis. In addition, patients with bipolar illness have increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system, which may also lead to insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and increased risk of sudden cardiac death.2

Depressive syndromes may be neurotoxic. Abnormalities in cellular plasticity, cellular resilience, and intracellular signaling, as well as alterations in the size, shape, and density of neurons and glia, have been found. Studies employing neuroimaging and neuropsychological tests have demonstrated abnormalities in brain morphology and function in patient populations with depressive syndromes and in those with diabetes. Common physiologic mechanisms have been implicated, including insulin-glucose homeostasis, immuno-inflammatory processes, and oxidative stress mechanisms.


Metabolic Comorbidities in Patients With Bipolar Disorder

Блокирование 5-HT7 рецепторов как потенциальный механизм быстрого антидепрессивного эффекта

Current antidepressants still display unsatisfactory efficacy and a delayed onset of therapeutic action. Here we show that the pharmacological blockade of serotonin 7 (5-HT7) receptors produced a faster antidepressant-like response than the commonly prescribed antidepressant fluoxetine. In the rat, the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist SB-269970 counteracted the anxiogenic-like effect of fluoxetine in the open field and exerted an antidepressant-like effect in the forced swim test. In vivo, 5-HT7 receptors negatively regulate the firing activity of dorsal raphe 5-HT neurons and become desensitized after long-term administration of fluoxetine. In contrast with fluoxetine, a 1-week treatment with SB-269970 did not alter 5-HT firing activity but desensitized cell body 5-HT autoreceptors, enhanced the hippocampal cell proliferation, and counteracted the depressive-like behavior in olfactory bulbectomized rats. Finally, unlike fluoxetine, early-life administration of SB-269970, did not induce anxious/depressive-like behaviors in adulthood. Together, these findings indicate that the 5-HT7 receptor antagonists may represent a new class of antidepressants with faster therapeutic action.

Pharmacological Blockade of 5-HT7 Receptors as a Putative Fast Acting Antidepressant Strategy

Significant Weight Gain Associated with Post-Clozapine Antipsychotics

Significant Weight Gain* Associated with Post-Clozapine Antipsychotics
*≥7% body weight increase vs placebo; 4-8 week trials

Пролонгированная инъекционная форма рисперидона вызывает больше побочных эффектов

Long-acting, injectable risperidone, the first second-generation antipsychotic available in the United States in this formulation, is no better than oral antipsychotics for the treatment of unstable schizophrenia, a new study published in the March 3 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine suggests.

In a randomized study of more than 300 Veterans Affairs (VA) patients, investigators found injectable risperidone did not significantly decrease hospitalization rates or improve symptoms, social function, or quality of life compared with those treated with "clinicians' choice" of oral antipsychotics. The risperidone-treated group also reported more adverse effects.

No Benefit, More Side Effects With Injectable Risperidone

Стратегии лечения тиков при синдроме Туретта

The majority of treatment options for tics are pharmacological. The most commonly prescribed drugs are primarily dopamine antagonists, such as neuroleptics (e.g. haloperidol), benzamides (e.g. sulpiride) or atypical antipsychotics (e.g. risperidone). Other agents that may be efficacious include drugs which modulate noradrenaline (e.g. clonidine), GABA (e.g. benzodiazepines) and acetylcholine (e.g. nicotine). Nonpharmacological interventions include behavioural approaches such as habit reversal training and exposure response prevention therapy. Surgical techniques involving deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus or globus pallidus may also be considered for severe, treatment refractory patients. Some of the more recent treatments that have been trialled include electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

.
Treatment Strategies for Tics in Tourette Syndrome

Эффективность атипичных антипсихотиков при делирии

Haloperidol is the mainstay of delirium treatment.8 Compared with atypical antipsychotics in delirium treatment, haloperidol doses < 3.5 mg/d have not been associated with an increase in extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS).9

Although not devoid of side effects, atypical antipsychotics are an alternative to haloperidol.8,10 This article briefly summarizes the current evidence on the use of atypicals for treating delirium.

Evidence for antipsychotics

Haloperidol has been the antipsychotic of choice for treating delirium symptoms. It is recommended by the Society of Critical Care Medicine7 and is regarded as safe, cost-effective, and efficacious for delirium5 despite a risk of dose-related EPS and potential cardiac conduction alterations.5,14

Risperidone is not indicated for treating delirium but is one of the most extensively studied atypical antipsychotic alternatives to haloperidol. Evidence consisting primarily of case reports has illustrated the potential efficacy of risperidone in treating delirium (Table 2).10,15-19

Clinical Point

In a small double-blind, randomized trial, risperidone was effective but not significantly more so than low-dose haloperidol

In 2004, Parellada et al17 observed significant mean improvements in all measures (Delirium Rating Scale [DRS], Mini-Mental State Exam [MMSE], positive subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS-P], and Clinical Global Impressions scale [CGI]) in 64 delirium patients treated with risperidone. In a 2004 double-blind trial of 28 delirium patients randomly assigned to risperidone or haloperidol, risperidone was effective but not significantly more efficacious than low-dose haloperidol for acute delirium treatment.18

Advantages of using risperidone include its lack of anticholinergic effects. Potential side effects include dose-related EPS and weight gain, which were observed in patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders and dementia-related behavioral disorders.20,21

Olanzapine. Much like risperidone, olanzapine’s use in delirium is relatively well described in the literature (Table 3).22-24 In a randomized, placebo-controlled study comparing olanzapine with haloperidol, 175 patients were treated for 7 days with olanzapine, haloperidol, or placebo. Olanzapine and haloperidol showed significantly greater DRS score improvement than placebo.24 There was no difference between olanzapine and haloperidol outcomes; however, olanzapine showed significant improvement by days 2 and 3 compared with haloperidol. Haloperidol was associated with a significantly higher rate of dystonia compared with olanzapine.

Olanzapine carries a risk of anticholinergic effects. This can be a drawback, especially in patients such as Ms. B whose delirium has an anticholinergic component. Olanzapine is available in an IM formulation, which can be an advantage when addressing agitation and medical comorbidities of delirium.

Quetiapine. Case reports have suggested quetiapine is effective for delirium (Table 4).10,25-27 In a prospective, open-label trial, Sasaki et al26 treated 12 delirium patients with a single bedtime dose of quetiapine. All patients achieved remission within several days of beginning quetiapine, and the drug was well tolerated with no detected EPS or excessive sedation.

Clinical Point

Quetiapine reduced delirium duration and agitation in a small double-blind randomized trial of adult ICU patients

In 2010 Devlin et al27 reported on the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 36 adult ICU patients. Compared with those receiving placebo, patients taking quetiapine had a statistically significant shorter time to first resolution of delirium, reduced duration of delirium, and less agitation as measured by the Sedation-Agitation Scale. Mortality, ICU length of stay, and incidence of QTc prolongation did not differ, but patients treated with quetiapine were more likely to be discharged home or to rehabilitation and to have more somnolence. Quetiapine’s side effect profile includes a low occurrence of EPS, sedation, and dose-related anticholinergic effects.25

Ziprasidone. The literature on ziprasidone for delirium so far is limited to a few anecdotal case reports (Table 5).28-31 In 2002, Leso and Schwartz28 successfully used ziprasidone to treat delirium in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus and cryptococcal meningitis. Ziprasidone was chosen for its lack of sedating effects and low EPS risk. The patient experienced significant clearing of his delirium and lowering of his DRS score. Ziprasidone eventually was discontinued because a fluctuating QTc interval associated with comorbid electrolyte imbalances—a potential drawback to ziprasidone.

In the case of Ms. B, ziprasidone appeared to be efficacious; however, improvement in her medical condition, rather than ziprasidone treatment, is the most likely explanation for the resolution of her delirium symptoms.

Aripiprazole. Alao et al30 reported on 2 delirium patients treated with 30 mg and 15 mg aripiprazole; improvement was monitored using the MMSE and DRS (Table 5).28-31 In both cases, confusion, disorientation, and agitation improved within 7 days of treatment. In the first case, the patient’s MMSE score improved from 5 to 28 and his DRS score decreased from 28 to 6. The second patient’s MMSE score improved from 7 to 27 and her DRS score went from 18 to 6.

Straker et al31 reported on 14 delirium patients treated with aripiprazole. Twelve patients had a ≥50% reduction in DRS, Revised-98 scores, and 13 showed improvement on CGI scores. The rate of adverse side effects was low. Three patients had prolonged QTc interval, but no patients developed arrhythmia or discontinued aripiprazole.

Atypical antipsychotics for delirium: A reasonable alternative to haloperidol?

Антипсихотики второго поколения в терапии депрессии

Abstract

Purpose of review The aim of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (MDD).
Recent findings In MDD, SGA monotherapy or adjunctive therapy to conventional antidepressants showed rapid onset of antidepressant efficacy. Although maintenance data are limited, quetiapine monotherapy, risperidone adjunctive therapy, and amisulpride adjunctive therapy significantly delayed the time to relapse as compared with placebo. In general, extrapyramidal symptoms appeared to be low with SGAs, but a higher incidence of akathisia was observed with aripiprazole. An elevated risk of weight gain was observed with olanzapine–fluoxetine combination, risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine compared with placebo. At present, there are insufficient data to confidently distinguish between different SGAs in the treatment of MDD. A recent meta-analysis found that adjunctive SGAs were significantly more effective than placebo, but differences in efficacy were not identified among the studied agents, nor were outcomes affected by trial duration or the method of establishing treatment resistance.
Summary Both SGA monotherapy and adjunctive therapy showed greater efficacy in the treatment of MDD than placebo, but augmentation is more widely utilized in treatment-resistant depression. Clinicians should routinely monitor for cardiometabolic side-effects and extrapyramidal symptoms during SGA therapy.

Quetiapine

The efficacy and safety of QTP-XR monotherapy in the treatment of MDD were evaluated in two 8-week, placebo-controlled RCTs.[7••,8•] In the first trial, QTP-XR 150 or 300 mg/day and duloxetine 60 mg/day were compared with placebo.[7••] All active treatment arms demonstrated significant improvement in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)[27] total scores compared with that of placebo at week 6. Significant improvement in depressive symptoms occurred at the end of week 1 with both QTP-XR 150 mg/day (−8.4, P < 0.01) and 300 mg/day (−8.2, P < 0.01) compared with placebo (−6.0), but not duloxetine 60 mg/day (−6.8, P = 0.30). At study endpoint (week 6), remission rates (MADRS ≤ 8) were significantly higher in the QTP-XR 300 mg/day (32.0%, P < 0.05) and duloxetine 60 mg/day groups (31.9%, P < 0.05) vs. placebo (20.4%), but not for QTP-XR 150 mg/day (26.5%, P = 0.27).
Sulpiride and Amisulpride

Apart from QTP-XR, SLP and ASLP are the only other SGAs that have been studied as monotherapy treatment for MDD in placebo-controlled trials. A moderately sized (n = 88) study found greater reduction in the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-21)[28] total score from baseline to endpoint in the SLP group (−10, P = 0.0007) than in placebo (−8). The only RCT of ASLP in the acute treatment of MDD compared a fixed dosage of ASLP 50 mg/day (n = 136) with paroxetine 20 mg/day (n = 136).[11] No statistically significant differences occurred between the two treatments, but a placebo group was not included to establish internal validity.[11] A long-term (6-month), fixed-dosage, placebo-controlled RCT in mild or moderate MDD or dysthymia compared the efficacy and safety of ASLP (50 mg/day) with imipramine (100 mg/day) and placebo.[12] Analysis of the primary outcome showed the mean change in MADRS total scores in both active treatment arms was significantly larger than that of placebo, although remission rates did not reach the level of statistical significance.

Second-generation Antipsychotics in Major Depressive Disorder: Update and Clinical Perspective

Сравнение атипичных антипсихотиков

For example, when switching from a tightly binding anticholinergic or antihistaminergic medication (eg, olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine) to one with less anticholinergic or antihistaminergic affinity (eg, aripiprazole, risperidone, ziprasidone), often transient rebound anxiety, insomnia, agitation and restlessness can occur. In addition, when switching from a tighter D2 binding agent to a looser-binding agent (eg, from risperidone to clozapine or quetiapine) or, particularly, to a partial dopamine agonist (eg aripiprazole) dopamine rebound symptoms, such as often transient worsening of psychosis, mania or aggression/agitation, can occur. A pharmacokinetic dopamine rebound may also occur when switching from a short half-life antipsychotic to a longer half-life antipsychotic (Table 1).4

The abrupt switch has the greatest potential for rebound and withdrawal phenomena. Even the conventional cross-titration can lead to problems when the pre-switch antipsychotic has a shorter half life and/or blocks more tightly cholinergic, histaminergic or dopaminergic receptors than the post-switch antipsychotic. Rebound phenomena can be minimized by avoiding abrupt or fast switching when the pre- and post-switch receptor affinities and/or half-lives differ considerably. Instead, an overlapping or “plateau” switch should be used. This consists of decreasing the pre-switch antipsychotic slowly (eg, 25–50% every 5 half-lives) and only after the post-switch antipsychotic has reached steady state (ie, ≤5 half lives on target dose). Adding calming medications during the switch period, such as benzodiazepines, antihistamines or sleep aides, can also minimize rebound phenomena.

A number of non-antipsychotic augmentation strategies have also been tested in schizophrenia patients with insufficient response to antipsychotic monotherapy. Of these, lithium,16 carbamazepine,17 and beta blockers18 were not superior to placebo when added to an antipsychotic. Similarly, benzodiazepine19 and valproate augmentation20 also did not show long-term superiority compared to placebo, although both agents might speed up the initial response. Although two large-scale studies showed no superiority of lamotrigine augmentation of antipsychotics compared to placebo,21 a meta-analysis demonstrated significant superiority regarding global ratings of psychopathology, positive and negative symptom change, as well as study-defined response when outcomes of patients were combined in whom lamotrigine was added to clozapine.22 This, however, has not been verified in a prospective study.

ECT augmentation has also been shown to be superior, both for acute efficacy and in maintenance treatment, when added to antipsychotic monotherapy in patients who have failed antipsychotic monotherapy.23

One meta-analysis suggested that augmentation of antipsychotics with antidepressants may be more helpful than placebo for schizophrenia patients with predominantly negative symptoms.24 Larger, validating studies are needed, however, and specific effects on negative symptoms need to be distinguished from proven effects of antidepressants on depressive symptoms in schizophrenia patients.25

Practical Dosing Strategies in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Part 2 - Switching and Combining Antipsychotics

Монотерапия рисперидоном в сравнении с терапией комбинацией низких доз рисперидона и галоперидола

Monotherapy is recommended for schizophrenia treatment, but the risk-benefit issue of antipsychotic drug combination (except for clozapine) remains unclear. Risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic drug, has a lower incidence of extrapyramidal syndrome but higher risks of prolactinemia and metabolic syndrome than haloperidol, a typical agent. This study compared efficacy and safety of risperidone monotherapy versus low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in schizophrenia. In this 6-week, double-blind study, patients were randomized to the combination group (2-mg/d risperidone plus 2-mg/d haloperidol, n = 46) or the monotherapy group (4-mg/d risperidone, n = 42). Efficacy assessments included Clinical Global Impression-Severity, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and subscales, Calgary Depression Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36. Safety was rigorously monitored. Response was defined as 30% reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. The 2 treatment groups were similar in (1) demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline, (2) response rate, and (3) improvement in various psychopathological measures and quality of life at end point. The monotherapy group had a higher increase in prolactin levels (P = 0.04) and Simpson-Angus Scale scores (P = 0.04) and a higher percentage of biperiden use (P = 0.045). There were no significant between-group difference in changes in weight, vital signs, corrected QT interval, liver/renal function, fasting glucose level, and lipid profiles. The findings suggest that risperidone monotherapy may yield higher prolactin levels than a combination of low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol. The 2 treatment groups are similar in efficacy, life quality, and other safety profiles. Future long-term studies are warranted.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of risperidone versus low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in treating schizophrenia.

Антипсихотики второго поколения в сравнении с перфеназином в терапии депрессивного синдрома у больных шизофренией

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also known as aytypicals, are not superior to the first-generation antipsychotic perphenazine in treating depression in patients with chronic schizophrenia

Although a significant improvement in depressive symptoms was found in all treatment groups over time, subanalyses found that quetiapine was significantly more effective than risperidone in the patients having a major depressive episode (MDE)

No Evidence to Support Recommendation to Use Atypicals Over First-Generation Antipsychotic

пролонгированная форма рисперидона vs кветиапин

Chronic management of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders is frequently complicated by symptomatic relapse. An open-label, randomized, active-controlled, 2-year trial evaluated 710 patients with schizophrenia or related disorders who were switched from stable treatment with oral risperidone, olanzapine, or conventional neuroleptics to risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) or oral quetiapine. Primary effectiveness evaluation was time-to-relapse. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs) reported for the duration of the study, Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), clinical laboratory tests, and vital signs. A total of 666 patients (n=329 RLAI, n=337 quetiapine) were evaluable for effectiveness measures. Baseline demographics were similar between treatment groups. Kaplan–Meier estimate of time-to-relapse was significantly longer with RLAI (p < 0.0001). Relapse occurred in 16.5% of patients with RLAI and 31.3% with quetiapine. RLAI and quetiapine were both safe and well tolerated. Weight gain affected 7% of patients with RLAI and 6% with quetiapine, with mean end point increases of 1.25±6.61 and 0±6.55 kg, respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in weight gain. ESRS total scores decreased similarly after randomization to either RLAI or quetiapine. Extrapyramidal AEs occurred in 10% of patients with RLAI and 6% with quetiapine. Treatment-emergent potentially prolactin-related AEs were reported in 15 (5%) patients with RLAI and 5 (2%) patients with quetiapine; hyperprolactinemia was reported in 43 (13.1%) patients with RLAI and 5 (1.5%) patients with quetiapine. Somnolence occurred in 2% of patients with RLAI and 11% with quetiapine. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial directly comparing relapse prevention with a second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotic and oral therapy. Time-to-relapse in stable patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder was significantly longer in patients randomized to RLAI compared with those randomized to oral quetiapine. Both antipsychotics were generally well tolerated.

Relapse Prevention in Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder with Risperidone Long-Acting Injectable vs Quetiapine: Results of a Long-Term, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial

Подбор доз антипсихотиков второго поколения

Drug-drug interactions or genetic variability may require using doses different from those recommended for atypical antipsychotics. Dosage alterations of olanzapine and clozapine, dependent on cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) for clearance, and quetiapine, dependent on cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), may be necessary when used with other drugs that inhibit or induce their metabolic enzymes. Smoking cessation can significantly increase clozapine, and perhaps olanzapine, levels. Ziprasidone pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are not likely to be important. Genetic variations of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and drug-drug interactions causing inhibition (CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A) or induction (CYP3A) may be important for risperidone, and perhaps for aripiprazole, dosing. Adding inhibitors may cause side effects more easily in drugs with a narrow therapeutic window, such as clozapine or risperidone, than in those with a wide therapeutic window, such as olanzapine or aripiprazole. Adding inducers may be associated with a gradual development of lost efficacy.

The Dosing of Atypical Antipsychotics

Смертность пациентов с деменцией получающих антипсихотические препараты

They found that no antipsychotic was associated with greater long-term mortality, but that haloperidol, olanzapine, and risperidone, but not quetiapine, were associated with a short-term increase in mortality during the first 30 days of prescribing.

Are Commonly Prescribed Antipsychotics Associated With Greater Mortality in Patients With Dementia?

Генотипы CYP450 и эффекты антипсихотиков

Metabolism of most antipsychotics depends on the CYP450 enzyme system, which is expressed predominantly in the liver (Table 1). CYP2D6 is one of these enzymes and may be responsible for metabolizing approximately 20% to 50% of all medications, including a number of antipsychotics.2 Genetic variations of CYP2D6 are common and the frequencies of these variants differ among racial groups.3

The half-life and other pharmacokinetic parameters of an antipsychotic metabolized by CYP2D6 may differ based on whether someone is a poor metabolizer (PM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), extensive metabolizer (EM), or ultrarapid metabolizer (UM).4 Regarding CYP2D6 metabolism among Whites, 3% to 5% are UMs, 70% to 80% are EMs, 10% to 17% are IMs, and 5% to 10% are PMs.5 By contrast, the percentage of PMs and UMs in the Asian population is low—about 1% for each phenotype; the IM phenotype is more common (65% to 70% in the Chinese population).5,6 The percentage of PMs in African Americans is roughly 2% to 6%.2

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism of commonly used antipsychotics*

Drug	CYP1A2	CYP2C9	CYP2C19	CYP2D6	CYP3A4/5
Aripiprazole				X	X
Asenapine	X			X	X
Chlorpromazine	X			X	X
Clozapine	X	X	X	X	X
Fluphenazine				X
Haloperidol	X			X	X
Iloperidone				X	X
Olanzapine	X			X
Paliperidone				X†	X†
Perphenazine	X	X	X	X	X
Quetiapine				X	X
Risperidone				X	X
Thioridazine			X	X
Ziprasidone	X				X
*Information obtained from the most recent prescribing information available from each drug’s manufacturer †According to paliperidone’s prescribing information, in vitro studies identify that CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 may be involved in paliperidone metabolism, but in vivo studies indicate that their role in eliminating paliperidone is minimal

Figure: Effects of CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status on the half-life of risperidone, aripiprazole, and iloperidone

EM: extensive metabolizer; PM: poor metabolizer
Source: References 7-9

It is not known if obtaining genotype information will provide better outcomes than a ‘trial and error’ approach

Should you order genetic testing to identify how patients metabolize antipsychotics?